Which case discussed the following legal principle: ‘The need for a binding contract between the partners to conduct the business together is fundamental to a partnership relationship.’?Group of answer choicesWarner Capital Pty Ltd v Shazbot Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 121Manley v Sartor [1927] Ch 157Cameron v Hogan (1934) 51 CLR 358McKinnon v Grogan [1974] 1 NSWLR 295

Which case states the following legal principle: ‘The description that the parties have placed on their relationship is relevant but is not a conclusive consideration in determining whether or not a partnership agreement exists.’?Group of answer choicesBova v Avati [2009] NSWSC 921Manley v Sartor [1927] Ch 157Cameron v Hogan (1934) 51 CLR 358McKinnon v Grogan [1974] 1 NSWLR 295

To bind, both parties should have a specific intention that can create a legal relationship, resulting in an agreement.

Each partner has the authority to enter into contracts which are binding upon the partnershipGroup of answer choicesTrueFalse

A partnership is an onerous contract because the law provides a name for it.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse

A partnership contract is fiduciary in nature.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse