14. A Junior analyst trained an Sklearn random forest classifier to predict the winner of football matches. The model is performing well on the train data set. When the model was evaluated on the test dataset it performed poorly. Which of the following will be useful in solving this problem?. Select all correct.increasing the min samples leaf in each tree of the forestreducing the number of trees in the forestdecreasing the max depth of each tree in the forestreducing the min samples split in each tree of the forest
Question
- A Junior analyst trained an Sklearn random forest classifier to predict the winner of football matches. The model is performing well on the train data set. When the model was evaluated on the test dataset it performed poorly. Which of the following will be useful in solving this problem?. Select all correct.increasing the min samples leaf in each tree of the forestreducing the number of trees in the forestdecreasing the max depth of each tree in the forestreducing the min samples split in each tree of the forest
Solution
The problem described here is a classic case of overfitting, where the model performs well on the training data but poorly on unseen data (test data). This means that the model has learned the training data too well, including its noise and outliers, and is not generalizing well to new data.
Here are the correct steps to solve this problem:
-
Increasing the min samples leaf in each tree of the forest: This is correct. Increasing the minimum number of samples required to be at a leaf node can reduce overfitting. This makes the model more conservative and prevents it from learning very specific patterns in the training data.
-
Reducing the number of trees in the forest: This is not necessarily correct. Reducing the number of trees might lead to underfitting where the model is too simple to capture the underlying pattern of the data.
-
Decreasing the max depth of each tree in the forest: This is correct. Decreasing the maximum depth of the trees can help to make the model more general. This is because it reduces the complexity of the learned models, hence, it can help to reduce overfitting.
-
Reducing the min samples split in each tree of the forest: This is not correct. Reducing the minimum number of samples required to split an internal node might lead to more complex trees and hence more overfitting. Instead, increasing this parameter might help to make the model more conservative and reduce overfitting.
So, the correct options are: increasing the min samples leaf in each tree of the forest and decreasing the max depth of each tree in the forest.
Similar Questions
Which of the following is a technique used to reduce overfitting in the Random Forest algorithm?Review LaterDecreasing the number of estimatorsIncreasing the maximum depth of the decision treesIncreasing the subsample sizeIncreasing the learning rate
Which of the following is a hyperparameter of the Random Forest algorithm?Review LaterLearning rateNumber of estimatorsMaximum depthSubsample size
You are fine-tuning a decision tree classifier for a marketing dataset. To prevent overfitting and ensure robust generalisability, you must adjust the depth of the decision tree after its initialisation but before it is fitted with data. Considering the decision tree `dt` has already been initialised with a random state, which of the following is the correct way to modify the tree's maximum depth?from sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeClassifierfrom sklearn.datasets import load_breast_cancerfrom sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split# Load datadata = load_breast_cancer()X = data.datay = data.target# Split dataX_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.25, random_state=42)# Initialise decision tree classifierdt = DecisionTreeClassifier(random_state=42)# [Your Code Heredt = DecisionTreeClassifier(max_depth=5, random_state=42)dt.set_params(max_depth=5)dt.set_params(max_depth=5).fit(X_train, y_train)dt.max_depth = 42
# We instantiat the tree and specity the depth parameterclf=tree.DecisionTreeClassifier(max_depth=4)# We fit the model using the training dataclf.fit(X_train,y_train)clf---------------------------------------------------------------------------ValueError Traceback (most recent call last)Cell In[5], line 5 2 clf=tree.DecisionTreeClassifier(max_depth=4) 4 # We fit the model using the training data----> 5 clf.fit(X_train,y_train) 7 clfFile ~/anaconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages/sklearn/base.py:1151, in _fit_context.<locals>.decorator.<locals>.wrapper(estimator, *args, **kwargs) 1144 estimator._validate_params() 1146 with config_context( 1147 skip_parameter_validation=( 1148 prefer_skip_nested_validation or global_skip_validation 1149 ) 1150 ):-> 1151 return fit_method(estimator, *args, **kwargs)File ~/anaconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages/sklearn/tree/_classes.py:959, in DecisionTreeClassifier.fit(self, X, y, sample_weight, check_input) 928 @_fit_context(prefer_skip_nested_validation=True) 929 def fit(self, X, y, sample_weight=None, check_input=True): 930 """Build a decision tree classifier from the training set (X, y). 931 932 Parameters (...) 956 Fitted estimator. 957 """--> 959 super()._fit( 960 X, 961 y, 962 sample_weight=sample_weight, 963 check_input=check_input, 964 ) 965 return selfFile ~/anaconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages/sklearn/tree/_classes.py:366, in BaseDecisionTree._fit(self, X, y, sample_weight, check_input, missing_values_in_feature_mask) 363 max_leaf_nodes = -1 if self.max_leaf_nodes is None else self.max_leaf_nodes 365 if len(y) != n_samples:--> 366 raise ValueError( 367 "Number of labels=%d does not match number of samples=%d" 368 % (len(y), n_samples) 369 ) 371 if sample_weight is not None: 372 sample_weight = _check_sample_weight(sample_weight, X, DOUBLE)ValueError: Number of labels=179 does not match number of samples=241756
Which of the following machine learning algorithm is based upon the idea of bagging?Random-forestRegressionClassificationDecision treeSAVE
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.