Which one is the core of an argument for the claim that aesthetic properties are not reducible to non-aesthetic properties?1 pointaesthetic properties are evaluativenon-aesthetic properties are descriptivenon-aesthetic properties are deductible from aesthetic propertiesaesthetic properties are not deductible from non-aesthetic properties

What is the difference between aesthetic and non-aesthetic properties?1 pointAesthetic properties are subvenient; non-aesthetic properties are supervenientAesthetic properties are evaluative; non-aesthetic properties are descriptiveAesthetic properties are descriptive; non-aesthetic properties are evaluativeAesthetic properties are intensional; non-aesthetic properties are extensional

According to aesthetic supervenience, if two paintings are indistinguishable, then1 pointThey must have the same aesthetic valueThey have different supervenient propertiesThey need not have the same aesthetic valueThey must have different base properties

1. There is beauty in argument. Do you believe this? Why do you say so?

Choose the correct antonym (word opposite in meaning) from the given choices of ‘Aesthetic’?GorgeousKeenDispleasingSure

In the West, ideals of beauty have been influenced by the aesthetic values of the Greeks, who focused on perfected, muscular bodies and constructing grand, symmetrical architecture. However, In traditional Japanese aesthetics, wabi-sabi, or the acknowledgement of ------- and imperfection, demonstrates that nothing is ever finished or perfect and was historically prized. Which choice completes the text with the most logical and precise word or phrase?rigidityeliminatetransienceeliminatepermanenceeliminatevoluptuousness