Question 14Although the Stanford Prison Experiment is a classic study in social psychology, it took place before modern-day ethical guidelines. Indeed, if Professor Plous were to propose a "Wesleyan Prison Experiment" identical to the original study, his university's Institutional Review Board (IRB) would reject the proposal, because modern IRBs never approve studies that:1 pointGenerate negative emotions among participants Lead people to behave in ways that they later regrettedDo not allow participants to choose their role (prisoner or guard)Do not obtain "informed consent" from the participants
Question
Question 14Although the Stanford Prison Experiment is a classic study in social psychology, it took place before modern-day ethical guidelines. Indeed, if Professor Plous were to propose a "Wesleyan Prison Experiment" identical to the original study, his university's Institutional Review Board (IRB) would reject the proposal, because modern IRBs never approve studies that:1 pointGenerate negative emotions among participants Lead people to behave in ways that they later regrettedDo not allow participants to choose their role (prisoner or guard)Do not obtain "informed consent" from the participants
Solution
The Institutional Review Board (IRB) would reject the proposal for a "Wesleyan Prison Experiment" identical to the original Stanford Prison Experiment due to several ethical issues.
-
Generation of Negative Emotions: Modern ethical guidelines for research involving human subjects prohibit studies that intentionally generate negative emotions among participants. The Stanford Prison Experiment is known for causing distress and psychological harm to the participants, which is unacceptable by today's standards.
-
Leading People to Behave in Ways They Later Regret: The Stanford Prison Experiment led participants to behave in ways that they later regretted, including acts of cruelty and dehumanization. This is another violation of modern ethical guidelines, which emphasize respect for the dignity and autonomy of research participants.
-
Lack of Role Choice: In the Stanford Prison Experiment, participants were randomly assigned to the roles of prisoners or guards. Modern ethical guidelines require that participants have the right to choose their role in a study, to ensure that they are comfortable with their participation and to avoid coercion.
-
Lack of Informed Consent: Finally, the Stanford Prison Experiment is criticized for not obtaining proper informed consent from the participants. Informed consent is a fundamental ethical requirement in research, ensuring that participants understand the nature of the study, its purpose, the procedures involved, any potential risks or benefits, and their right to withdraw at any time without penalty.
Therefore, due to these ethical issues, a proposal for a similar experiment would not be approved by an IRB today.
Similar Questions
What was the main conclusion drawn from the Stanford prison experiment?Group of answer choicessocial roles are powerful determinants of human behaviorstudents cannot be relied upon to act appropriatelystudents cannot be trusted in roles of authoritywhen operating in a group, some people will put forth less effort than if they were operating alone
The Stanford University Prison Experiment was:Funded by the US NavyA study of obedienceA study of power dynamicsA study of the abuse of powerAll of the aboveNone of the above
In the Stanford Prison Experiment, researchers assigned a number of college-aged participants to portray either prisoners or guards in a mock prison. The researchers were interested in assessing the effect this contrived situation had on the attitudes and behavior of both the prisoners and guards. The experiment began with the prisoners being arrested at their residences and then processed in a manner similar to what might occur in a genuine prison, including having the prisoners stripped of clothes, sprayed with a cleaning spray, given a uniform, and given a number, which is what they were called. Guards also wore uniforms. There was a typical prison schedule that the prisoners and guards followed. There was little instruction from the researchers about how the guards and prisoners should behave.A number of data were collected during the experiment, including behavioral observations, mood ratings, and qualitative observations. A prominent result of the experiment was that the attitudes and outlooks of both the prisoners and guards became increasingly negative. In addition, without instruction from experimenters about how to behave, prisoners and guards naturally assumed their stereotypical roles, with prisoners being passive and guards being assertive. Furthermore, this behavior often became extreme, with some guards being verbally abusive of prisoners.The experiment had to be terminated early, after less than one week, after several prisoners became very distressed. None of the guards wanted to end the experiment early. In interviews shortly after the experiment, several of the prisoners remained distressed, and some guards additionally were distressed about their perceived abuse of power. In long-term follow-ups, all participants viewed their experience as one which was difficult but ultimately rewarding in regard to the insight they gained.Adapted from Zimbardo et al. A Study of PrisonThe Stanford Prisoners and Guards in a Simulated Prison. Naval Research Review. 1973 under CCBY 4.0 Question 21Which of the following would have likely lessened the effects observed in the study? I. One guard stating that the treatment of prisoners was too harsh II. Giving information that past participants acted in similarly harsh ways III. Assigning roles based on a personality profile A.I onlyB.II onlyC.I and II onlyD.I and III only
What caused researchers to stop the Stanford prison experiment after only six days?A.The students who were guards were unable to control the prisoners.B.The students acting as prisoners were showing signs of extreme distress.C.The students who were acting as prisoners were aggressive and cruel.D.The students' parents had not given their consent to the experiment.
Question 2The use of prisoners in research is a concern under the Belmont principle of Justice because: Prisoners are not a representative sample of the general population Prisoners may not be used to conduct research that only benefits the larger society Prisoners are less educated that the general population and have difficulty understanding research Prisoners are not free to say noQuestion 3Informed consent is considered an application of which Belmont principle? Beneficence Justice Non-maleficence Respect for PersonsQuestion 4Which of the following is included in the Nuremberg Code: Confidentiality of data Voluntary consent Equitable selection of subjects Additional protection for vulnerable subjectsQuestion 5The National Research Act of 1974 Identified guidelines to ensure the ethical conduct of research. Identified the basic ethical principles of human subjects research. Required that all federal agencies have the same regulations governing human subjects research. Established the National Commission.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.