Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

The minimum number of justices required to vote in favor of granting certiorari to review a case is:Group of answer choices5423

Question

The minimum number of justices required to vote in favor of granting certiorari to review a case is:Group of answer choices5423

🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

The minimum number of justices required to vote in favor of granting certiorari to review a case is 4. This is known as the "rule of four". This rule allows four of the nine Justices to effectively control the Court's docket.

Similar Questions

In order for a writ of certiorari to be granted,*(A) a majority opinion must have no concurring opinions(B) there must be no dissenting opinion(C) four justices must support it being granted(D) at least five justices must be in agreement on the outcome of a cas

For the 8,000 or so certiorari requests it receives each year, the Supreme Court’s rule to determine whether any given case is heard isGroup of answer choicesthe justices must unanimously favor hearing the casefive of the nine justices must favor hearing the casefour of the nine justices must favor hearing the caseat least one of the nine justices must favor hearing the case

When the Supreme Court denies certiorari, it means the Court:Group of answer choicesis supporting the lower court ruling.takes no official position on the case.finds the issue moot.believes the case lacks merit.

When the Court grants certiorari, it will:Group of answer choicesconsider hearing that case.hear and decide that case.officially end that term.allow the ruling of the lower court to stand.

Before the Court is a Petition for Review on Certiorari1 filed to assail the Decision2 dated March 15, 2019 and the Resolution3 dated January 15, 2020 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CV No. 110751. Said rulings of the CA modified (but basically affirmed) the Orders dated December 13, 20174 and March 7, 20185 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Makati City, Branch 66 in Civil Case No. R-MKT-17-01339-CV. Said Orders of the trial court essentially dismissed Grandspan Development Corporation's (petitioner) Complaint6 for Sum of Money against Franklin Baker, Inc. (FBI) and Advance Engineering Corporation (AEC; collectively, respondents) on the ground of the said trial court's lack of jurisdiction over the case.

1/1

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.