What RULE (law) did the court refer to in the Cahaba Disaster Recovery v. Rogers case? (Choose ALL correct answers)Multiple select question.To preserve its right to recover damages, a buyer who has accepted nonconforming goods must timely notify the seller of the breach.Damages for tortious interference is the value between the goods accepted and value they would have had if they had been as warrantedA buyer who accepts nonconforming goods does not forfeit its right to otherwise recover for a seller’s breach.Damages for breach of warranty is the difference between value of the goods accepted and value they would have had if they had been as warranted

What was the court's CONCLUSION (decision, holding) in the Cahaba Disaster Recovery v. Rogers case?Multiple choice question.Reversed for International Lining. Rogers is liable for the $208,100 purchase price, less the value of the FOC boom as accepted.For Cahaba. International Lining is liable for the $208,100 purchase price, less the value of the FOC boom as accepted by Cahaba.For International Living. Cahaba is liable for the $208,100 purchase price, less the value of the FOC boom as accepted by InternationalFor Rogers. International Lining is liable for the $208,100 purchase price, less the value of the FOC boom as accepted by Rogers

What was the court's ANALYSIS (legal reasoning) in the Cahaba Disaster Recovery v. Rogers case? (Choose TWO correct answers)Multiple select question.International’s tender of FOC boom did not conform to the terms of its contract with Cahaba and constitutes nonperformanceInternational's e-mail which was sent immediately after it discovered that the FOC boom was not absorbent satisfies the UCC's notice requirementCahaba’s e-mail which was sent immediately after Cahaba discovered that the FOC boom was not absorbent satisfies the UCC's notice requirementCahaba's tender of FOC boom did not conform to the terms of its contract with Rogers and constitutes nonperformance

What was the main ISSUE (legal question) in the Cahaba Disaster Recovery v. Rogers case?Multiple choice question.Did Rogers' email of nonconforming goods serve as an adequate notice under the UCC?Did International Lining’s tender of FOC boom conform to the terms of its contract with Cahaba?Did International Lining’s email of nonconforming goods serve as an adequate notice under the UCC?Did Cahaba's tender of FOC boom conform to the terms of its contract with International Lining?

When a limitation on a buyer's remedies on breach by a seller is unconscionable, the __________.Multiple choice question.buyer will be sued for using the remedies.court will enforce the limitation.court has the right to charge cases on the seller for causing emotional damages.buyer has all the rights given to an injured buyer under the UCC.

According to the UCC, if the warranty covers future performance of goods, then a breach of warranty occurs ________.Multiple choice question.when the goods have been delivered and the buyer refuses to pay for themat the time the goods are ordered by the buyerwhen the goods have been used for a substantial time by the buyerat the time the buyer should have discovered the defect in the product