Which scenario describes a federal court applying the principle of precedent?A.A federal judge finds a criminal defendant not guilty because she believes his case should have been tried in a state court.B.A court rules that a state is allowed to racially segregate restrooms because earlier courts ruled in favor of segregated buses.C.A defendant convicted of a federal crime appeals to the Supreme Court, but his request is denied.D.A judge in a U.S. court of appeals overturns a defendant's conviction on the grounds that the law she violated is unconstitutional.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
Question
Which scenario describes a federal court applying the principle of precedent?A.A federal judge finds a criminal defendant not guilty because she believes his case should have been tried in a state court.B.A court rules that a state is allowed to racially segregate restrooms because earlier courts ruled in favor of segregated buses.C.A defendant convicted of a federal crime appeals to the Supreme Court, but his request is denied.D.A judge in a U.S. court of appeals overturns a defendant's conviction on the grounds that the law she violated is unconstitutional.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
Solution
To determine which scenario describes a federal court applying the principle of precedent, we need to understand what precedent means in the legal context. Precedent refers to a legal principle or rule that is established in a previous case and is either binding or persuasive for a court when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts.
Let's analyze each scenario:
A. A federal judge finds a criminal defendant not guilty because she believes his case should have been tried in a state court.
- This scenario does not involve the application of precedent. It is about jurisdiction, not about following previous court decisions.
B. A court rules that a state is allowed to racially segregate restrooms because earlier courts ruled in favor of segregated buses.
- This scenario involves applying a previous court decision (segregated buses) to a similar issue (segregated restrooms). This is an example of applying precedent.
C. A defendant convicted of a federal crime appeals to the Supreme Court, but his request is denied.
- This scenario involves the appeals process, not the application of precedent.
D. A judge in a U.S. court of appeals overturns a defendant's conviction on the grounds that the law she violated is unconstitutional.
- This scenario involves a judge making a decision based on the constitutionality of a law, not necessarily on precedent.
Therefore, the scenario that describes a federal court applying the principle of precedent is:
B. A court rules that a state is allowed to racially segregate restrooms because earlier courts ruled in favor of segregated buses.
Similar Questions
In common law legal systems, a principle or rule established in a previous legal case that is either binding or provides an example for a court when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts is called precedent.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse
How does the federal judicial system promote the constitutional principle of rule of law?A.By preventing courts from relying on previous rulings when deciding new caseB.By requiring state courts to handle civil cases while federal courts handle criminal casesC.By establishing new laws when Congress fails to protect vulnerable citizensD.By allowing multiple courts to review a case or ruling before closing it completelySUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
Far from being rigid and inflexible, the doctrine of precedent enables judges to develop legal principles and respond to broader historical and institutional developments in and outside the legal system…… Discuss this statement.
Suppose that a lower court must decide whether it is constitutional for a city to establish different curfew times for minor males and females. To decide the case, the court turns to similar cases on differential curfews that were made by the U.S. Supreme Court and other higher courts. The court then uses these previously decided cases as a legal guide for deciding the case at issue. The use of previously decided cases as a binding precedent for lower court decisions is an example of: Blank______.Multiple choice question.legal realismstare decisisutilitarianismstatutory law
When a person is convicted of a federal crime, which level of the judicial system will the person most likely encounter if he or she appeals his case?A.A U.S. court of appealsB.A state appellate courtC.The Supreme CourtD.A U.S. district court
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.