If the results are statistically significant at the 5% level, would they be also statistically significant at the 10% level?

Everything else remaining the same, is it easier to reject a null hypothesis with a 5% or 1% level of significance?

he p-value for the hypothesis test is 0.0139 , which means the observed difference is/ is noy statistically significant at the 5% level

Significance LevelLet’s suppose that for a particular test, you have been able to reject the null hypothesis at 5% significance level. Can you reject the null hypothesis for the same test at 10% significance level?YesNoCannot be said

If a hypothesis is not rejected at a 5% level of significance, it will ___.Group of answer choicesalso not be rejected at the 1% levelalways be rejected at the 1% levelsometimes be rejected at the 1% levelNot enough information is given to answer this question

A researcher wants to find out if there is a significant difference between men and women in the average number of tattoos that a person has. After doing the statistical analysis, the researcher finds that the p-value is 0.003. If the chosen significance level is 0.05 (5%), which of the following statements is the best interpretation of this p-value? The results are statistically significant. The results are not statistically significant. The magnitude of a p-value has no impact on statistical significance.