Which of the following statements are true in regards to Windows Physical support using the RBS (Choose two)?Windows Server support for 32-bit and 64-bitWindows supported versions are 2008 R2, 2012, 2012 R2 and 2016Windows supported versions are 2008, 2008 R2, 2012, 2012 R2 and 2016WIndows Server support is for 64-bit only
Question
Which of the following statements are true in regards to Windows Physical support using the RBS (Choose two)?Windows Server support for 32-bit and 64-bitWindows supported versions are 2008 R2, 2012, 2012 R2 and 2016Windows supported versions are 2008, 2008 R2, 2012, 2012 R2 and 2016WIndows Server support is for 64-bit only
Solution
Para determinar cuáles de las afirmaciones son verdaderas en relación con el soporte físico de Windows utilizando RBS, revisemos cada una de las opciones:
-
Windows Server support for 32-bit and 64-bit: Esta afirmación sugiere que Windows Server ofrece soporte tanto para versiones de 32 bits como de 64 bits. Sin embargo, las versiones más recientes de Windows Server se centran principalmente en el soporte de 64 bits.
-
Windows supported versions are 2008 R2, 2012, 2012 R2 and 2016: Esta afirmación enumera las versiones de Windows Server que son compatibles. Es importante verificar si todas estas versiones son compatibles con RBS.
-
Windows supported versions are 2008, 2008 R2, 2012, 2012 R2 and 2016: Esta afirmación incluye una versión adicional, Windows Server 2008, además de las mencionadas en la afirmación anterior. Nuevamente, es necesario confirmar la compatibilidad de todas estas versiones con RBS.
-
Windows Server support is for 64-bit only: Esta afirmación indica que el soporte de Windows Server es exclusivamente para versiones de 64 bits, lo cual es consistente con las tendencias recientes de Microsoft.
Analizando la información disponible y las tendencias de soporte de Microsoft, las afirmaciones verdaderas son:
- Windows supported versions are 2008, 2008 R2, 2012, 2012 R2 and 2016
- Windows Server support is for 64-bit only
Estas dos afirmaciones son correctas en el contexto del soporte físico de Windows utilizando RBS.
Similar Questions
La version de Windows qui a constitué un échec pour Microsoft est :Question 3Veuillez choisir une réponse.a.Windows Vistab.Windows 1c.Windows XPd.Windows 9
La version de Windows qui a constitué un échec pour Microsoft est :Question 3Veuillez choisir une réponse.a.Windows Vistab.Windows 1c.Windows XPd.Windows 95
Which of the following require the support of an operating system to provide virtualization services?*1 pointType I hypervisorsType II hypervisorsType III hypervisorsType IV hypervisors
Which of the following statements accurately describes the impact of transitioning from 32-bit to 64-bit architectures on device drivers? Group of answer choicesDevice drivers must be rewritten entirely to support 64-bit architecturesTransitioning to 64-bit architectures has no impact on device driversDevice drivers may need adjustments to accommodate changes in memory addressing and data structuresDevice drivers require no modifications when transitioning between architecture types
If the forest functional level is set to Windows Server 2016, then which is the lowest allowed version for domain functional level?
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.