In the 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case Schenck v. U.S. concerning the distribution of literature that opposed the World War I-era military draft, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes declared that the U.S. Constitution did not protect speech that created which one of the following?Group of answer choicesA "clear and present danger"An "atmosphere of hate"An environment for "imminent lawless action"An "imminent danger to public safety"

In the Supreme Court decision Schenck v. United States, it was stated that the government can limit speech if such speech brings a*(A) clear motivation(B) clear and present danger(C) negative feeling toward a public official(D) standard of indecency to the public realm

The actions and discourse of anti-war messages are protected under the 1st Amendment because of this rationale...Group of answer choicespromotes democracyPromotes the discovery of truthpromotes autonomycannot be restricted

Which right, not explicitly stated in the Constitution, was asserted by the Warren Court?Group of answer choicesthe right to privacy, including freedom to use birth controlthe right to free speech, even when making violent threats to government officialsthe right to protest outside of politicians’ homesthe right to pray in public schoolsthe right to sue for libel

In a unanimous decision related to sentencing for a hate crime, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a belief is no longer protected when it __________.A.is expressed in writingB.threatens the constitutional protection of free speechC.becomes the motive for a crimeD.is published or broadcast

Question 5 of 15Which statement from the dissenting opinion of Tinker v. Des Moines court decision best supports the reasoning that the conduct of the student protesters was not within the protection of the free speech clause of the First Amendment?A.This case, therefore, wholly without constitutional reasons, in my judgment, subjects all the public schools in the country to the whims and caprices of their loudest-mouthed, but maybe not their brightest, students.B.In Cox v. Louisiana, the Court clearly stated that the rights of free speech and assembly "do not mean that everyone with opinions or beliefs to express may address a group at any public place and at any time."C.Even a casual reading of the record shows that this armband did divert students' minds from their regular lessons, and that talk, comments, etc., made John Tinker "self-conscious" in attending school with his armband.D.There is also evidence that a teacher of mathematics had his lesson period practically "wrecked," chiefly by disputes with Mary Beth Tinker, who wore her armband for her "demonstration."SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS