The adverse effects of greenhouse gases are therefore 'external' to the market, which means there is usually only an ethical-rather than an economic-incentive for businesses and consumers to reduce their emissions.
Question
The adverse effects of greenhouse gases are therefore 'external' to the market, which means there is usually only an ethical-rather than an economic-incentive for businesses and consumers to reduce their emissions.
Solution
The statement above is discussing the concept of externalities in economics, specifically in relation to greenhouse gas emissions.
-
Greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane, are released into the atmosphere by various human activities, including burning fossil fuels for energy and deforestation. These gases trap heat from the sun in the Earth's atmosphere, leading to a rise in global temperatures, a phenomenon known as global warming.
-
The adverse effects of these emissions, such as climate change, rising sea levels, and extreme weather events, are not accounted for in the market price of the goods and services that cause the emissions. This is what is meant by the effects being 'external' to the market.
-
Because these costs are not reflected in market prices, businesses and consumers do not have an economic incentive to reduce their emissions. In other words, they do not bear the full cost of the damage their emissions cause, so they do not have a financial reason to cut back on activities that produce these emissions.
-
The only incentive they might have is an ethical one. They might choose to reduce their emissions because they believe it is the right thing to do for the planet and future generations.
-
However, without some form of government intervention, such as a carbon tax or cap-and-trade system, to internalize these external costs, it is unlikely that businesses and consumers will significantly reduce their emissions. This is because doing so would likely involve incurring additional costs, such as
Similar Questions
Mainstream economists see pollutants like greenhouse gases as a negative externality. So when do economists deem pollution excessive?When the air and water become too dirty to drink or breatheWhen the government has to interfereWhen companies do not truly reflect the cost of their products to society
How does environmental sustainability influence business operations in the external environment? A. Increases production costs B. Encourages innovation C. Reduces consumer demand D. Limits regulatory compliance
Why GHG emissions are considered a market failure?1 pointThey are caused by market power concentration of transnational companies. They cause informational asymmetries between supply and demand side for goods. They are caused by behavioural biases of the consumers choosing polluting products. They constitute negative externalities which imply costs to the society that are not currently being considered.
How should a multinational enterprise approach climate and environmental pollution and instability in an ethical way when doing business in a foreign country?Mitigate the cost of addressing it.Prevent or manage it.Ignore and downplay it.Seek government waivers.
Companies that persist in treating climate change solely as a corporate social responsibility issue rather than a business problem will risk the most significant consequences. Which of the following is part of a strategic approach for corporations to internalise externalities: Group of answer choicesVarious frameworks on reporting can't be used as they don't demonstrate the variations of ESG issues.Each company's approach should be the same as the environmental issues are global, not company-specific.Companies need to anticipate the ways that climate change may directly affect their businesses.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.