What is thought to account, in part, for the rise in the prevalence of peanut allergy? Question 14 options: a) increased inflammation of the immune system due to altered ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids b) hyperstimulation of the immune system by multiple vaccines c) excess sodium consumed as part of the peanuts d) impaired digestion/absorption resulting from elevated leptin and adiponectin levels e) exposure to medicinal skin creams containing peanut oil
Question
What is thought to account, in part, for the rise in the prevalence of peanut allergy? Question 14 options:
a)
increased inflammation of the immune system due to altered ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids
b)
hyperstimulation of the immune system by multiple vaccines
c)
excess sodium consumed as part of the peanuts
d)
impaired digestion/absorption resulting from elevated leptin and adiponectin levels
e)
exposure to medicinal skin creams containing peanut oil
Solution
The rise in the prevalence of peanut allergy is thought to be accounted for, in part, by increased inflammation of the immune system due to an altered ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids. So, the answer is option a.
Similar Questions
Jorge is allergic to peanuts. Explain how the immune system will react when Jorge eats a peanut.
If Sam eats peanuts, he will get a rash and hives and may have trouble breathing. What best describes Sam’s condition with peanuts?Group of answer choiceshungerappetitefood intolerancefood allergy
Overall, 58.2% of mothers consumed peanuts while breast-feeding and 22.5% directly introduced peanuts to their infant by 12 months. At 7 years, 9.4% of children were sensitized to peanuts. The lowest incidence (1.7%) was observed among children whose mothers consumed peanuts while breast-feeding and directly introduced peanuts before 12 months. Incidence was significantly higher (P < .05) if mothers consumed peanuts while breast-feeding but delayed introducing peanuts to their infant beyond 12 months (15.1%), or if mothers avoided peanuts themselves but directly introduced peanuts by 12 months (17.6%). Interaction analyses controlling for study group and maternal atopy confirmed that maternal peanut consumption while breast-feeding and infant peanut consumption by 12 months were protective in combination, whereas either exposure in isolation was associated with an increased risk of sensitization (P interaction = .003).
What are the two types of treatments being tested in the trials for peanut allergies?
The first investigation of anti-IgE therapy for the management of FA was performed in a double-blind, randomized, dose-ranging (150, 300, or 450 mg of anti-IgE antibodies (TNX-901)) trial in 84 patients, 12 to 60 years of age, with a positive history of peanut allergy. Although the highest TNX-901 dose significantly improved clinical symptoms and increased the threshold dose for peanuts, 25% failed to develop a tolerance to peanuts, suggesting a wide treatment response variability [36]. A subsequent double-blinded, placebo-controlled study was started in children 6 years of age, but discontinued because of safety issues related to pre-omalizumab challenges [37]. An open-label study in 14 adults between 18 and 50 years of age showed a significant increase in the mean tolerated dose of peanut protein (from 80 mg to 5080 mg) after 6 months of omalizumab; however, the administration of antihistamines and epinephrine was required in 10 of the 14 enrolled subjects [38]. To increase the safety of immunotherapy and possibly enhance tolerance development, a combination of anti-IgE therapy and FA-AIT was investigated. Two small double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge trials in patients (age, 7–25 years) with a peanut [39] or cow’s milk [40] allergy were conducted by using omalizumab in combination with rapid oral food desensitization. During a washout period, participants were generally treated with omalizumab for 2 to 5 months and subsequently continued on treatment until a maintenance dose of OIT was achieved. In the first study, 92% of patients tolerated the challenge, but 46% of children experienced moderate to severe adverse events [39]. In the second trial, 9 out of 11 patients were able to complete dose escalation and only 1.8% of subjects still showed reactions requiring epinephrine [40]. Subsequently, a phase one clinical trial was designed in 25 participants (median age 7 years) with multiple FA. Participants were receiving OIT for up to 5 allergens simultaneously with omalizumab. Anti-IgE therapy was administered for 8 weeks prior to and 8 weeks following the initiation of the OIT protocol. Adverse reactions were reported in 5.3% of subjects. Additionally, 94% of reactions were mild and only one subject experienced a severe reaction requiring epinephrine [23]. Following this, a phase one double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges study, enrolling patients aged 4–15 years with multiple FA, confirmed that adjunctive omalizumab with OIT provided a safe and rapid desensitization with a lower median rate of adverse events (27% vs. 68%). Interestingly, no serious or severe adverse events were recorded [41].
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.