Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

Consider the game theory model for a Drug Test. Player 1 is an athlete who chooses whether to use steroids or not. Player 2 is the official who decides whether to conduct a drug test on Player 1. Payoffs to players are presented below. Check Pass Dope -alpha, alpha 1, -1 Clean 0, -1 0, 0 Assume alpha > 1, which of the following statements is TRUE? If α increases, athletes will be more likely to dope and drug tests are less likely to be carried out If α decreases, athletes will be less likely to dope and drug tests are more likely to be carried out If α increases, athletes will be less likely to dope and drug tests are less likely to be carried out If α decreases, athletes will be less likely to dope and drug tests are less likely to be carried out

Question

Consider the game theory model for a Drug Test. Player 1 is an athlete who chooses whether to use steroids or not. Player 2 is the official who decides whether to conduct a drug test on Player 1. Payoffs to players are presented below.

Check	Pass

Dope -alpha, alpha 1, -1 Clean 0, -1 0, 0

Assume alpha > 1, which of the following statements is TRUE?

If α increases, athletes will be more likely to dope and drug tests are less likely to be carried out

If α decreases, athletes will be less likely to dope and drug tests are more likely to be carried out

If α increases, athletes will be less likely to dope and drug tests are less likely to be carried out

If α decreases, athletes will be less likely to dope and drug tests are less likely to be carried out

...expand
🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

The correct statement is: "If α increases, athletes will be less likely to dope and drug tests are less likely to be carried out."

Here's why:

In this game theory model, α represents the penalty for being caught doping. If α increases, the penalty for being caught doping becomes more severe. This makes doping a less attractive option for the athlete (Player 1), so they are less likely to dope.

On the other hand, if the athlete is less likely to dope, the official (Player 2) has less incentive to conduct a drug test. This is because the cost of conducting a drug test (-1) is higher than the payoff of catching a clean athlete (0). Therefore, if α increases, drug tests are less likely to be carried out.

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

PBased on the informaiton you learned from the drug test game solved in the lecture, which of the following is FALSE? A. The drug test game has a unique Nash equilibrium B. When payoffs of one player change in a game, then the Nash equilibrium strategies of all players change C. Some games do not have a pure strategy Nash equilibrium

Which of the following statements is true?Group of answer choicesIndividual payoffs in both decision theory and game theory are affected by the actions of others.The actions of others do not affect individual payoffs in decision theory, but they can affect individual payoffs in game theory.Individual payoffs in both decision theory and game theory are not affected at all by the actions of others.The actions of others do not affect individual payoffs in game theory, but they can affect individual payoffs in decision theory.

Game theory models are classified by the ans.  number of strategiesnumber of playerssum of all payoffsall of these Previous Marked for Review Next

Select the correct statement about the trust game in our lecture. Group of answer choicesThe SPE of the game does not capture "trust" between two players since x=0 in the SPE. However, our experiment suggests people tend to trust the other player in average. The game captures "trust" since x=100 in the SPE. This result is also supported by our experiment. Since x=0 in the SPE, player 1 cannot get a higher payoff regardless of player 2's choice of y. In our experiment, it was more profitable to play x=0 rather than x=100 in average if you are randomly matched with one of your classmates.

Consider the following entry game played between rivals Huawei and Apple. Firstly, Huawei can consider entering a new market (E) or not entering (NE). If Huawei opts for NE, the payoffs to Huawei and Apple are (10, 100), respectively. If Huawei enters, Apple observes this choice by its rival and can itself choose NE or E. This choice by Apple is observed by Huawei, who can then make a choice whether to Retreat (R) or Stay (S). If Huawei entered (E) the market, and Apple chose to NE, if Huawei opted to R, the payoffs are (10, 50). If Huawei opted for E, Apple chose NE and Huawei then Stayed (S) the payoffs are (80, 20). If Huawei chose E, then Apple chose E, and then Huawei chose R, the payoffs are (5, 95). Finally, if Huawei opted for E, Apple E, then Huawei chose S, the payoffs are (0, 40). In the credible (subgame perfect) equilibrium outcome of the game, the payoff enjoyed by Apple isGroup of answer choices10050209540

1/1

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.