What useful functions in the legal process can separate and dissentingopinions have?Check all that apply1 pointThey underscore the impartiality of judgesThey can contribute to the development of the lawThey allow judges to avoid common deliberations They serve as a means for judges to express their individual opinions onissues remotely connected to the case
Question
What useful functions in the legal process can separate and dissentingopinions have?Check all that apply1 pointThey underscore the impartiality of judgesThey can contribute to the development of the lawThey allow judges to avoid common deliberations They serve as a means for judges to express their individual opinions onissues remotely connected to the case
Solution
The useful functions in the legal process that separate and dissenting opinions can have include:
-
They underscore the impartiality of judges: Dissenting opinions show that judges are not simply rubber-stamping the majority opinion, but are independently considering the facts and law of the case. This can enhance the credibility of the judiciary and the rule of law.
-
They can contribute to the development of the law: Dissenting opinions can influence future cases and sometimes even become the majority view over time. They can introduce new legal theories, challenge prevailing views, and stimulate legal debate.
-
They serve as a means for judges to express their individual opinions on issues remotely connected to the case: Dissenting opinions allow judges to voice their views on legal issues that may not be directly addressed in the majority opinion. This can provide valuable insights and perspectives on the law.
The statement "They allow judges to avoid common deliberations" is not typically considered a useful function of dissenting opinions. Judges are expected to engage in deliberations and the dissenting opinion is usually a result of these deliberations, not a way to avoid them.
Similar Questions
Question 2Which of the following descriptions of common law judges is not true?1 pointCommon law judges are allowed to write separate or dissenting opinionsJudges in common law countries have the primary power to call evidence.One of the functions of common law judges is to answer questions about the law
Which Supreme Court procedure involves justices hearing oral arguments and expert testimony by both parties in a case?A.DeliberationB.Sharing of opinionsC.Judicial reviewD.Public arguments
The doctrine of judicial reviewGroup of answer choicesis a modern creation of activist judges from the civil rights eraholds that the Supreme Court possesses the authority to rule acts of Congress unconstitutionalis expressly provided for in the Constitutionis used to issue nonbinding advisory opinions
What is the power of judges in a democracy?A) To review public laws and declare them unconstitutionalB) To enforce laws without restrictions or influenceC) To make decisions based on political considerationsD) To remove themselves from deciding cases of conflict
______ law is composed of judges’ legal opinions that reflect community practices and evolve over time.Group of answer choicesCommonMandatoryCivilSovereign
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.