Choose the correct definition of a counter argument.A counter argument is the greatest or highest form of an adjective.A counter argument is a literary term used to describe situations where the audience are aware of things that the characters are not.A counter argument directly opposes a conflicting idea or theory.A counter argument is when a word/phrase is deliberately repeated several times in a text, generally close together, often in order to emphasise a point.I DON'T KNOWSUBMIT ANSWER
Question
Choose the correct definition of a counter argument.A counter argument is the greatest or highest form of an adjective.A counter argument is a literary term used to describe situations where the audience are aware of things that the characters are not.A counter argument directly opposes a conflicting idea or theory.A counter argument is when a word/phrase is deliberately repeated several times in a text, generally close together, often in order to emphasise a point.I DON'T KNOWSUBMIT ANSWER
Solution
A counter argument directly opposes a conflicting idea or theory.
Similar Questions
Why are counter arguments useful in writing?Counter arguments allow the opposition the chance to persuade the reader.Counter arguments are good ways to count the number of arguments being made.Counter arguments allow the writer to challenge arguments made by the opposition.Counter arguments allow the writer to agree with opposing views.
4. Which among the following is NOT a definition of a Counterclaim?*It provides a conflicting angle to the main claim.It is a statement that contradicts one’s claim and is usually proven and supported by both reasons and evidences.This is the part of an argument where a statement offers an explanation behind a party’s claim.Counterclaims are statements that are used to contradict someone’s statement through a formal argument.
What is the definition of an argument?Group of answer choicesA shouting match between two or more people.A dialogue or conversation about controversial topics.A debate among friends.A group of statements in which some of them (the premises) are intended to support another of them (the conclusion).
Historians refute counterclaims in argumentative essays in order to:A.demonstrate their awareness of theories that challenge their conclusions.B.admit that their conclusions are incomplete and still require more research.C.include an argumentative thesis in an otherwise explanatory essay.D.introduce information into their essays that has not been corroborated.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
1.Circular reasoning2.Slippery slope3.Ad hominem4.Ad populum5.Red herringa.An attack on or criticism of someone's character rather than the logic or content of the argumentb.Appeals to the popularity of a practice or concept as a method of persuasionc.The use of an argument's conclusion as a premise for proving the argument (assuming what it is attempting to prove)d.A tactic that is used to distract from an argument by avoiding key issues or ignoring opposing viewse.A conclusion based on the premise, "if this, then that," often with an extreme or unlikely outcome
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.