Absorption costing differs from marginal costing is the .a.amount of fixed costs that will be incurred.b.amount of costs assigned to individual units of products .c.kind of activities for which each can be used .d.fact that standard costs can be used with absorption costing but not with marginal costing

Absorption costing and marginal costing differ primarily in the way they handle fixed and variable costs:

a. Amount of fixed costs that will be incurred: Both methods will incur the same amount of fixed costs. The difference lies in how these costs are accounted for. In absorption costing, fixed costs are spread over all units produced, while in marginal costing, fixed costs are treated as period costs and are written off against profits of the period in which they are incurred.

b. Amount of costs assigned to individual units of products: In absorption costing, both variable and fixed costs are assigned to individual units of products. In marginal costing, only variable costs are assigned to individual units. Fixed costs are treated as period costs.

c. Kind of activities for which each can be used: Both methods can be used for a variety of activities. However, absorption costing is typically used for external financial reporting because it is in compliance with GAAP, while marginal costing is often used for internal decision-making processes.

d. Fact that standard costs can be used with absorption costing but not with marginal costing: This is not necessarily true. Standard costs can be used with both absorption and marginal costing. The difference lies in how these costs are treated. In absorption costing, standard costs are used to spread fixed costs over all units produced. In marginal costing, standard costs are used to determine the variable cost per unit.