In the imaginary case of Smith v R the case involves stealing a car. When making a decision in the judgement how will the judge be guided by earlier cases in higher courts?Group of answer choicesEarlier cases will be sometimes binding depending on how similar the fact situation is between the cases.never binding because they are two different cases.of little value to later courts.always binding following the doctrine of precedent regardless of any differences between the cases
Question
In the imaginary case of Smith v R the case involves stealing a car. When making a decision in the judgement how will the judge be guided by earlier cases in higher courts?Group of answer choicesEarlier cases will be sometimes binding depending on how similar the fact situation is between the cases.never binding because they are two different cases.of little value to later courts.always binding following the doctrine of precedent regardless of any differences between the cases
Solution
The correct answer is:
"Always binding following the doctrine of precedent regardless of any differences between the cases."
The doctrine of precedent, also known as stare decisis, is a fundamental principle of law that requires lower courts to follow the decisions of higher courts within the same jurisdiction. This ensures consistency and predictability in the law. Even if the facts of the cases are different, the legal principles established by the higher court must be followed.
Similar Questions
In common law legal systems, a principle or rule established in a previous legal case that is either binding or provides an example for a court when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts is called precedent.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse
Justice Jon Snow is a judge of the High Court of Australia. His Honour has heard both sides of the case before him and is about to make his decision. The lawyer for the plaintiff has cited a case from the Supreme Court of Victoria, with very similar facts to the present case, in which the plaintiff won the case.Which of the following statements about precedent is INCORRECT?Question 11Answera.The precedent cited by the plaintiff may have persuasive value, but does not have to be followed by Justice Snow.b.As the precedent cited by the plaintiff is materially similar to the case to be decided, Justice Snow is bound to decide the case in a manner which is consistent with the judgement of the Supreme Court of Victoria.c.As the Supreme Court of Victoria is below the High Court, Justice Snow is not bound to follow the decision.d.Once Justice Snow decides the case, this decision will become binding on all other courts in Australia.
The concept that courts will continue to rely on prior cases to ensure consistency in the law is called:Group of answer choicesvenue.original jurisprudence.lex talionis.stare decisis.
According to the doctrine of precedent, which of the following is INCORRECT?Question 4Answera.Decisions of courts at the same level in a court hierarchy are not binding authority between them.b.A persuasive precedent set by a lower court does not have to be followed by a higher court.c.Precedents from the High Court of Australia are only binding on Federal courts.d.A decision of the Victorian Court of Appeal is binding on any other court in Victoria, and is persuasive in relation to any other court of the country.
A previous judgement cited by the court to decide on a similar set of facts:A.PrecedentB.CaseC.Obiter dictaD.Judicial dicta
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.