Archaeologists believe that populations in the northern Southwest were increasing through time, based primarily on __________________________. Larger refuse / midden deposits than previous times. You Answered Greater numbers of sites than previous times Greater numbers of human burials than previous times Larger sites than previous times Correct Answer Greater numbers of larger sites
Question
Archaeologists believe that populations in the northern Southwest were increasing through time, based primarily on __________________________. Larger refuse / midden deposits than previous times. You Answered Greater numbers of sites than previous times Greater numbers of human burials than previous times Larger sites than previous times Correct Answer Greater numbers of larger sites
Solution
Archaeologists believe that populations in the northern Southwest were increasing over time. This belief is primarily based on the greater number of larger sites compared to previous times. This means that there were more sites of human habitation or activity, and these sites were larger in size, indicating a larger population.
Here are the steps to answer this question:
-
Understand the question: The question is asking for the primary evidence that archaeologists use to believe that populations in the northern Southwest were increasing over time.
-
Identify the key points: The key points in the question are "populations in the northern Southwest", "increasing over time", and "based primarily on".
-
Formulate the answer: Based on the key points, the answer is that this belief is primarily based on the greater number of larger sites compared to previous times.
-
Check the answer: Make sure the answer addresses all the key points in the question and is logically sound. In this case, the answer does address all the key points and is logically sound, as a greater number of larger sites would indeed indicate a larger population.
Similar Questions
The strongest archaeological claims about the past (pick all that apply):Group of answer choicesAre justified by arguments that take the context of where artifacts were discovered into consideration.Are backed up by a lot of high quality evidence.Cannot be challenged by the discovery of new evidence.Fit believably with other independent evidence from site and other sites in the region.
Why have experts struggled to quantify the extent of the decline of indigenous American peoples in North, Central, and South America during this time period?Group of answer choicesThere were no eye witness accounts.Census records and population data for this period do not existColumbus did not leave records of his conquestNone of the above
Which of the following can be regarded as paleontological evidence for past changes in ecosystems? (1 mark)a) Fossil recordsb) Ice core drillingc) Rock formationsd) Current plant and animal life forms
Analyses of radiocarbon dates, occupational sequences and stone tool discard rates indicate Aboriginal populations likely fragmented into refugia during the Last Glacial Maximum.
Price and Gebauer argue that inequality in the Neolithic of Northern Europe was expressed through differences in domestic architecture. Elites built large palatial estates that were the center of the settlements. True False
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.