During the Second World War, about 375,000 civilians died in the United States and about 408,000 members of the United States armed forces died overseas. On the basis the those figures, it can be concluded that it was not much more dangerous to be overseas in the armed forces during the Second World War than it was to stay at home as a civilian. Which of the following would reveal most clearly the absurdity of the conclusion drawn above?Choose the best optionClear ResponseCounting deaths among members of the armed forces who served in the United State in addition to deaths among members of the armed forces serving overseasExpressing the difference between the numbers of deaths among civilians and members of the armed forces as a percentage of the total number of deathsSeparating deaths caused by accidents during service in the armed forces from deaths caused by combat injuriesComparing death rates per thousand members of each group rather than comparing total numbers of deathsComparing deaths caused by accidents in the United States to deaths caused by combat in the armed forces

The vast majority of World War II casualties were among _____.A.the Allied powersB.colonized peoplesC.the Axis powersD.prisoners of war

During World War II, _____ led to a high number of deaths among Chinese and German civilians.A.supply chain issuesB.famine and diseaseC.military activityD.crimes against humanity

During World War I, approximately one-third of draftees into the United States military were rejected due to:Group of answer choicesPoor fitnessAll of theseThe belief that women should not be left home aloneInability to shoot a gun accurately

If a particular media report focused attention on an air attack that killed several civilians during a war, but never mentioned that this attack was retaliation for a much more devastating attack by the other side which killed many more civilians, what might this reasonably lead you to conclude?ResponsesA The reported attack was most likely a fake or a hoax.The reported attack was most likely a fake or a hoax.B The reported attack was actually justified, even if civilians were killed.The reported attack was actually justified, even if civilians were killed.C The media source is surely not guilty of bias, but is probably just guilty of slipshod and careless reporting.The media source is surely not guilty of bias, but is probably just guilty of slipshod and careless reporting.D The reported attack is possibly being highlighted and the unreported one is going ignored because the media source in question is biased.

The chart above seems to proves the point that atroops were not the only people affected by World War I. bfighting was mostly limited to the battlefield in World War I. cthe United States was impacted more than other countries in World War I. dGermany lost more people than any of the major participants in World War