Direction: In the following question, there is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement:The Chief Minister emphasised the point that the Government will try its best for the development of farmers and rural poor.Conclusions:I. The former Government had not tried seriously for the development of these people.II. This Government will not try seriously for the development of urban poor.

In the following question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement :Parents are prepared to pay any price for an elite education to their children.Conclusions :I. All parents these days are very well off.II. Parents have an obsessive passion for perfect development of their children through good schooling.

Q 4.   Read the following statements:The New Farm Laws are bound to be unpopular with either the farmers or the middlemen. If the New Farm Laws are unpopular with the farmers, they should be scrapped. The government should modify the New Farm Laws if they are unpopular with the middlemen.If the above statements are true which of the following must also be true.A)  The govt should try to popularise the New Farm Laws with either the farmers or the middlemen.B)  If the New Farm Laws are popular with the middlemen, then the govt should scrap them.C)  The government should modify the New Farm Laws only if it will not reduce its popularity with the farmers.D)  The New Farm Laws should be scrapped, they are not popular among the farmers.E)  The famers will continue to remain unpopular so all Farm Laws should be scrapped

In the question below are given two or three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Give answer.Statements:No tree is a flowerSome trees are fruitsConclusions: (I) Fruits that are trees are not flowers.(II) No fruit is a flower.

Statement: Ahmedabad has a lower population and hence is a safer place to live Conclusions: I) A city which has less population is a better place to live II Ahmedabad has lower number of crimes than bombayChoices:- Only assumption I is implicit. Only assumption II is implicit. Both I and II are implicit Neither I nor II is implicit

In the question below are given two or three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Give answer.Statements: All roads are poles. No pole is houseConclusions:I. Some roads are houses.II. Some houses are poles.