首先列出下列标准格式论证中不正确的部分，然后对论证中不符合标准格式且无法轻易指出的部分进行评论： P1：我们知道，绵羊可以识别多达 20 张不同的人脸。 P2：山羊和猪一样聪明，即使它们的瞳孔是奇怪的方形。 R4 据农民说，许多牛还喜欢吃旧的哲学小说。 因此很有可能、 Conc： 牛有丰富的内心世界，绵羊和山羊也一样。 #### Certainly, let's break down the argument and identify the issues:P1: We know that sheep can recognise up to 20 different human faces.This premise is presented as a factual claim without any supporting evidence or source citation. It lacks specificity in terms of who "we" refers to and the basis of the claim.P2: Goats are as smart as pigs, even with their weird square pupils.This premise contains subjective language ("smart") without clear criteria or evidence to support the comparison between goats and pigs. The mention of "weird square pupils" is irrelevant to the argument's conclusion.R4 Also many cows Fike to eat old philosophical novels, according to farmers.The phrasing "Fike to eat" seems to be a typographical error. Assuming you meant "like to eat," this premise introduces a claim about cows' eating preferences for old philosophical novels, which is highly implausible and lacks credible evidence.Thus probably,The term "thus probably" lacks clarity and does not explicitly indicate the logical relationship between the premises and the conclusion. Standard form arguments usually present the premises leading to a more definite conclusion.Conc: Cows have rich inner lives, and so do sheep and goats.The conclusion drawn from the premises lacks a clear and direct connection. The premises discuss recognition of human faces, intelligence comparisons between animals, and eating preferences for novels, but they don't directly support the conclusion about rich inner lives.Additional Comments:The argument lacks logical structure and coherence. The premises are not properly aligned to lead to the given conclusion.The premises contain factual claims that are not supported by evidence or sources.The argument includes irrelevant and unclear statements, such as the discussion of pupils and eating habits.In summary, the argument suffers from a lack of clear premises, logical connections, and supporting evidence. It includes irrelevant details and subjective statements. The conclusion is not well-supported by the premises provided.
Question
首先列出下列标准格式论证中不正确的部分，然后对论证中不符合标准格式且无法轻易指出的部分进行评论： P1：我们知道，绵羊可以识别多达 20 张不同的人脸。 P2：山羊和猪一样聪明，即使它们的瞳孔是奇怪的方形。 R4 据农民说，许多牛还喜欢吃旧的哲学小说。 因此很有可能、 Conc： 牛有丰富的内心世界，绵羊和山羊也一样。 #### Certainly, let's break down the argument and identify the issues:P1: We know that sheep can recognise up to 20 different human faces.This premise is presented as a factual claim without any supporting evidence or source citation. It lacks specificity in terms of who "we" refers to and the basis of the claim.P2: Goats are as smart as pigs, even with their weird square pupils.This premise contains subjective language ("smart") without clear criteria or evidence to support the comparison between goats and pigs. The mention of "weird square pupils" is irrelevant to the argument's conclusion.R4 Also many cows Fike to eat old philosophical novels, according to farmers.The phrasing "Fike to eat" seems to be a typographical error. Assuming you meant "like to eat," this premise introduces a claim about cows' eating preferences for old philosophical novels, which is highly implausible and lacks credible evidence.Thus probably,The term "thus probably" lacks clarity and does not explicitly indicate the logical relationship between the premises and the conclusion. Standard form arguments usually present the premises leading to a more definite conclusion.Conc: Cows have rich inner lives, and so do sheep and goats.The conclusion drawn from the premises lacks a clear and direct connection. The premises discuss recognition of human faces, intelligence comparisons between animals, and eating preferences for novels, but they don't directly support the conclusion about rich inner lives.Additional Comments:The argument lacks logical structure and coherence. The premises are not properly aligned to lead to the given conclusion.The premises contain factual claims that are not supported by evidence or sources.The argument includes irrelevant and unclear statements, such as the discussion of pupils and eating habits.In summary, the argument suffers from a lack of clear premises, logical connections, and supporting evidence. It includes irrelevant details and subjective statements. The conclusion is not well-supported by the premises provided.
Solution
Similar Questions
下列哪些學術研究行為可能構成「抄襲與剽竊」？A.整段地照抄別人的作品而沒有註明出處。B.自己研究資料的統計結果不甚理想，故變造數據，以符合期待中的結果。C.將他人的創作改頭換面，未註明出處，使其看起來像是自己的創作。D.分別複製不同文章的不同段落，未註明出處地放到自己的文章中。 (1)AC。 (2)ACD。 (3)ABC。 (4) ABCD。
以下关于放射对机体消化系统中性腺的影响下列说法错误的为A：胃肠道粘膜上皮细胞的辐射有较高的敏感性，因此照射腹部比照射其他部位产生的效应要明显，症状出现也早，如恶心、呕吐、腹泻等B：急性放射病时，小肠粘摸上皮细胞可发生出血、溃疡和坏死C：慢性放射病时，胃粘膜可出现萎缩，消化机能明显减弱D：胃肠道各部分粘膜对辐射敏感性依次为：胃最敏感，大肠和小肠次之
下面是一组雅思IELTS口语考试的对话。考官问出问题，考生回答。你来优化考生的回答，使答案能拿到极高的分数。你可以更改句式使句子结构更合理，也可以更改用词使其表达更地道，或修改任何英语错误。但请注意，你不必更改所有表达，也可以保留一些被合理使用的表达。 --Are you good at memorising things ? --emm, it's depends on which kinds of things that I'm going to memory. It is rough for me to learn language due to the poor memory skill of vocabulary and poems. But I usually find it unconscious while bearing logical operation or breathtaking natural landscape into my mind. --Have you ever forgotten something important? --Well, I haven't miss anything paramount for me. May because my daily life is quite mediocre, or "flat" would be a more accurate word, which cause my imperatives conspicuous. --What do you need to remember in your daily life? --To be frank with you, I don't remember any new things except some new English word I learned. There are many elusive words that I haven't ever met them whether in any English passages or on social media like youtube, which severely frustrated me. --How do you remember important things? --Remember them day to day, and utilize with flexibility, just like language learning. In fact, English learning could be the most premier task for each IETLS candidates, I suppose.
在以下哪种情况下，获取定性数据有意义？您必须勾选每个合适的答案。请注意，错误答案将被扣分。答案选择组您的研究旨在了解您画廊的参观者所使用的语言。您的研究旨在了解为什么视觉艺术家不申请当地政府资助。您的研究想要了解墨尔本最受欢迎的文化活动。您的研究想要建立一个理论来解释为什么 35 岁以下的人喜欢沉浸式剧院体验。
1. 撰写一份报告，与下表列出的清洁行业平均水平相比，对运营第一个月后企业的盈利能力、流动性和财务状况进行评论。2. 提出相关且具体的策略，以改善商店的运营和融资状况。 在您的分析中，您可能需要包括有关适合业务的营销实践、广告政策以及融资或投资策略的建议，并讨论比率分析的优点和局限性，尤其是在这种情况下。
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.