According to the author, diseases were less widespread during the hunter-gatherer days because(I) people generally subsisted on meat.(II) people lived only on plant produce.(III) the populations were less dense.(IV) the world was not well connected. II and III III and IV II,III and IV Only II
Question
According to the author, diseases were less widespread during the hunter-gatherer days because(I) people generally subsisted on meat.(II) people lived only on plant produce.(III) the populations were less dense.(IV) the world was not well connected. II and III III and IV II,III and IV Only II
Solution
According to the author, diseases were less widespread during the hunter-gatherer days because of several factors. Let's break down the options provided:
(I) People generally subsisted on meat: This option is not mentioned by the author, so we cannot consider it as a reason for the lower prevalence of diseases.
(II) People lived only on plant produce: The author does not explicitly state that people lived only on plant produce, but it is mentioned that they were hunter-gatherers. This suggests that their diet consisted of a variety of foods, including plants. Therefore, this option could be a contributing factor to the lower prevalence of diseases.
(III) The populations were less dense: The author mentions that the populations during the hunter-gatherer days were less dense. This means that people lived in smaller groups and had less contact with others, which could have limited the spread of diseases. So, this option is also a possible reason for the lower prevalence of diseases.
(IV) The world was not well connected: The author does not directly mention the connectivity of the world during the hunter-gatherer days. However, it can be inferred that since populations were less dense and people lived in smaller groups, there would have been limited interaction and contact with other groups. This limited connectivity could have contributed to the lower spread of diseases.
Based on the analysis, the correct answer would be II and III, as both options are mentioned by the author as possible reasons for the lower prevalence of diseases during the hunter-gatherer days.
Similar Questions
How did the lives of hunter-gatherer groups change with the cultivation of plants?*1 pointThey faced food shortages.They became more nomadic.They relied less on gathering food.They abandoned agriculture altogether.
Which population of organism was first to be wiped out due to the disease? What was the role of this population of organism in the food chain?
Which statement accurately describes how the global transfer of disease in the pre-modern world facilitated the colonization of the Americas?1a. The introduction of European crops and livestock to the Americas led to increasedagricultural productivity, supporting colonization efforts.b. Indigenous populations in the Americas had immunity to European diseases,preventing widespread health issues during colonization.c. The transfer of diseases such as smallpox from Europe to the Americas devastatedindigenous populations, paving the way for European conquest.d. The pre-modern world had effective medical measures that prevented the spread ofdiseases during the colonization of the Americas.
Which of the following was NOT a consequence of the rise of agriculture?increased levels of violent conflictboom in human populationreduction in the amount of foragingestablishment of permanent settlements
Historically, the development of agriculture permitted people to – Group of answer choiceshave more time for hunting.maintain smaller numbers.have more vacations.decrease feritlity rates.settle permanently in one location.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.