Find the implication of the following statement: "Either he plays Ludo or eats breakfast."a.He is eating breakfast implies he is not playing Ludo.b.He is playing Ludo, implies he is not eating breakfast.c.All of the aboved.He is not eating breakfast implies he is playing Ludo.
Question
Find the implication of the following statement: "Either he plays Ludo or eats breakfast."a.He is eating breakfast implies he is not playing Ludo.b.He is playing Ludo, implies he is not eating breakfast.c.All of the aboved.He is not eating breakfast implies he is playing Ludo.
Solution
The implication of the statement "Either he plays Ludo or eats breakfast" can be understood as follows:
a. He is eating breakfast implies he is not playing Ludo: This is not necessarily true. The original statement doesn't imply that he can't do both activities at the same time. It only states that he is doing at least one of them.
b. He is playing Ludo, implies he is not eating breakfast: This is also not necessarily true for the same reasons as above.
c. All of the above: Since neither a nor b are necessarily true, this option is also not correct.
d. He is not eating breakfast implies he is playing Ludo: This is true. The original statement implies that if he is not doing one activity, then he must be doing the other. So if he is not eating breakfast, then he must be playing Ludo.
So, the correct answer is d. He is not eating breakfast implies he is playing Ludo.
Similar Questions
Which of the following is a logical conclusion based on the two statements below?If Jake forgets his snack, then he will be hungry at school.Jake forgot his snack.A.Jake was not hungry at school.B.Jake also missed breakfast.C.Jake was hungry at school.D.Jake ate his snack.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
Statements:All fruits are tasty.No tasty is good.All goods are yummy.Conclusions:I. All yummy things being tasty is a possibility.II. All fruits being yummy is a possibility.OptionsIf only conclusion I followsIf either conclusion I or conclusion II followsIf both conclusion I and conclusion II followIf neither conclusion I nor conclusion II followsIf only conclusion II follows
Which of the following is an example of a valid argument?Question 7Select one:A.If Kim plays, then Sandy won't play. If Sandy plays, then Kelly will be happy. So if Kim plays, Kelly won't be happy.B.Sandy won't play without Kim, and Kelly won't play without Sandy. Logically, the only thing to do is to have them all play.C.If Kim doesn't play, then Sandy won't play, either. If Sandy doesn't play, then Kelly won't play. So Kim won't play.D.If Kim doesn't play then Sandy will play instead. If Sandy plays, then Kelly will be happy. So if Kim doesn't play, Kelly will be happy.E.Kim and Sandy won't play, but Kelly will. If Kelly plays, we'll win. Too bad for Kim and Sandy.
Consider this conditional statement: If you eat a whole box of donuts, then you will get a stomach ache.Under which of the following conditions would the conditional statement be false?Group of answer choicesYou eat a whole box of pizza and end up with a stomach ache.You eat a half a box of donuts and you get a stomach ache,You eat a whole box of donuts and don't get a stomach ache.You eat a whole pizza and don't get a stomach ache.You don't eat any sugar today and you get a stomach ache.
statements:All eggs are tomatoes.No tomato is a potato.All potatoes are goods.Conclusions:I. Some tomatoes may be goods.II. All eggs being goods is a possibilityOptionsIf only conclusion I followsIf either conclusion I or conclusion II followsIf both conclusion I and conclusion II followIf neither conclusion I nor conclusion II followsIf only conclusion II follows
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.