Dark matter is a little-understood form of matter composed of particles that do not absorb, reflect, or emit light. Recently, physicists have revived the idea that dark matter is actually formed from the remains of primordial black holes created during the Big Bang. This claim was echoed by researchers in a 2017 paper who used mathematical models to estimate the characteristics, size, and location of primordial black holes. Which finding, if true, would most directly support the physicists' claim?Primordial black holes are estimated to have been too small to account for all the dark matter theorized to exist in the universe.eliminateExcess infra-red radiation that has been detected in the universe is found to be attributable to primordial black holes.eliminateThe theorized arrangement of dark matter is found to match the theorized arrangement of primordial black holes.eliminateEvidence emerges that suggests that primordial black holes grew into the supermassive black holes that are observable in the universe today.

Dark matter is hypothesized to make up about 27% of the universe's mass-energy content but does not emit, absorb, or reflect electromagnetic radiation, making it invisible and detectable only through its gravitational effects. Despite extensive efforts, scientists have yet to directly observe dark matter particles or fully understand their properties.Similarly, dark energy is believed to be responsible for the observed accelerated expansion of the universe. It comprises approximately 68% of the universe's mass-energy content and is characterized by negative pressure, causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate over time. However, the nature and origin of dark energy remain elusive, posing a significant challenge to physicists.Understanding the true nature of dark matter and dark energy is crucial for developing a complete and accurate model of the universe's structure and evolution. Researchers are actively working on various experimental and theoretical approaches to unravel these mysteries, but they remain among the most compelling and unsolved questions in modern physics.

According to Glen Cathey, Dark Matter results constitute:

What is the experimental evidence for the existence of dark energy?

what if, black holes ARE made from dark matter, and dark matter is a substance created when baryonic matter is compressed to such extreme pressures and forces, that it breaks space-time, and forms a black hole. Now, back to the rest of the dark matter all over the universe. what if, all of that was created due to the extremely dense universe, mere seconds after the big bang??? it is proven that after a bit of time after the big bang stars called quasi stars were formed with black holed raging inside of them. what if, in some places, the density was so high, but not too high, and dark matter was formed. This would also kind of explain the formation of ULTRAMASSIVE BLACK HOLES like TON-618. Another theory of mine is that the huge amounts of dark matter could be formed by large accumulations of energy. it has been proven, that these large energy shits can make particle-antiparticle pairs, in eg. hawking radiation. The early universe had massive amounts of energy, so what if these dumptrucks of energy are what create dark matter? It would still have to have a huge amount of energy at teh "edge" of teh universe, cuz energy is conserved, and the "expansion energy" is converted to thermal, light and other types of energy. (edited)[9:25 PM]

Which of the following are NOT possible candidates for dark matter?Group of answer choicesBlack holesBrown DwarfsMACHO'sRed Giant Stars