From statement 1, we know that S has secured less marks than only R and T. This means S has secured more marks than P and Q. So, among R, T and S, S has the least marks. But we don't know the comparison between P, Q and S.

From statement 2, we know that Q has secured more marks than P. But we don't know the comparison between P, Q and S.

So, even if we combine both statements, we can't definitively say who has secured the least marks among P, Q, R, S and T. Therefore, the data in both statements 1 and 2 together is not sufficient to answer the question.

Question

From statement 1, we know that S has secured less marks than only R and T. This means S has secured more marks than P and Q. So, among R, T and S, S has the least marks. But we don't know the comparison between P, Q and S.

From statement 2, we know that Q has secured more marks than P. But we don't know the comparison between P, Q and S.

So, even if we combine both statements, we can't definitively say who has secured the least marks among P, Q, R, S and T. Therefore, the data in both statements 1 and 2 together is not sufficient to answer the question.

Knowee AI · Accepted Answer

From statement 1, we know that S has secured less marks than only R and T. This means S has secured more marks than P and Q. So, among R, T and S, S has the least marks. But we don't know the comparison between P, Q and S.

From statement 2, we know that Q has secured more marks than P. But we don't know the comparison between P, Q and S.

So, even if we combine both statements, we can't definitively say who has secured the least marks among P, Q, R, S and T. Therefore, the data in both statements 1 and 2 together is not sufficient to answer the question.

Question

Solution

Similar Questions

Upgrade your grade with Knowee