Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

In 1798 Thomas Malthus argued that populations grew exponentially while food supplies grew arithmetically. Consequently, Malthus argued that food shortages would develop until famine and other checks slowed population growth. What statement correctly explains why Malthus’ prediction did not come true in 1800s Europe?ResponsesUrbanization resulted in smaller household sizes, and the mechanization of agriculture increased food production.Urbanization resulted in smaller household sizes, and the mechanization of agriculture increased food production.Immigration to Europe and the abolition of slavery resulted in a more productive agricultural labor force.Immigration to Europe and the abolition of slavery resulted in a more productive agricultural labor force.Rising education levels among women and increased numbers of single-person households reduced fertility and the demand for food.Rising education levels among women and increased numbers of single-person households reduced fertility and the demand for food.Antinatalist population policies placed limits on the number of children per family and reduced the demand for food.Antinatalist population policies placed limits on the number of children per family and reduced the demand for food.Global trade in manufactured food products increased the food supply and offset the demand for food.

Question

In 1798 Thomas Malthus argued that populations grew exponentially while food supplies grew arithmetically. Consequently, Malthus argued that food shortages would develop until famine and other checks slowed population growth. What statement correctly explains why Malthus’ prediction did not come true in 1800s Europe?ResponsesUrbanization resulted in smaller household sizes, and the mechanization of agriculture increased food production.Urbanization resulted in smaller household sizes, and the mechanization of agriculture increased food production.Immigration to Europe and the abolition of slavery resulted in a more productive agricultural labor force.Immigration to Europe and the abolition of slavery resulted in a more productive agricultural labor force.Rising education levels among women and increased numbers of single-person households reduced fertility and the demand for food.Rising education levels among women and increased numbers of single-person households reduced fertility and the demand for food.Antinatalist population policies placed limits on the number of children per family and reduced the demand for food.Antinatalist population policies placed limits on the number of children per family and reduced the demand for food.Global trade in manufactured food products increased the food supply and offset the demand for food.

...expand
🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

The statement that correctly explains why Malthus’ prediction did not come true in 1800s Europe is: "Urbanization resulted in smaller household sizes, and the mechanization of agriculture increased food production."

Here's why:

  1. Urbanization: As more people moved to cities, household sizes decreased. This reduced the overall population growth rate, which in turn reduced the demand for food.

  2. Mechanization of Agriculture: The Industrial Revolution in the 1800s brought about significant advancements in farming technology. Machines like the seed drill and the reaper made farming more efficient, which increased food production. This increase in food production was able to keep up with, and even surpass, the rate of population growth.

The other options mentioned, such as immigration, rising education levels among women, antinatalist population policies, and global trade, may have also played a role in preventing Malthus' prediction from coming true. However, the impact of urbanization and the mechanization of agriculture were the most significant factors.

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

Which was Thomas Malthus's argument?View Available Hint(s)for Part AHint 1for Part A.Who was Thomas Malthus, and what did he assert in his work An Essay on the Principle of Population?He argued that if there was no control over population growth, then our civilization would be consumed by famine and war by the end of the 20th century.He argued that if there was no control over population growth, then we would simply create technology to correct the problem.He argued that if there was no control over population growth, then population numbers would increase indefinitely and this would not cause problems.He argued that if there was no control over population growth, then the population would come under check because of war, disease, and starvation.

Why did Thomas Malthus believe that population growth would surpass the available resources?Multiple choice question.There were not enough rich people to help poor families.Fast population growth seemed to surpass the growth of the food supply.There were not enough peasants to grow the necessary crops.There was too much illegal emigration.

What factor played a major part in keeping Thomas Robert Malthus's prediction from coming true?A.Rates of infectious disease went up around the world.B.The Industrial Revolution increased levels of material production, which had the effect of pushing down birth rates.C.Life expectancy decreased around the world.D.Global inequality became greater.

Thomas Malthus believed excess population growth leads to social problems, whereas Karl believed that excess population was the result, not the source, of other problems.

Malthusian Theory

1/3

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.