Deer, mice, owls, and crickets are most likely members of the same:communitynichepopulationspeciestrophic level
Question
Deer, mice, owls, and crickets are most likely members of the same:communitynichepopulationspeciestrophic level
Solution
The correct answer is "community".
Here's why:
-
Species: This refers to a group of living organisms consisting of similar individuals capable of exchanging genes or interbreeding. Deer, mice, owls, and crickets are all different species.
-
Population: This refers to all the organisms of the same group or species, which live in a particular geographical area. Deer, mice, owls, and crickets do not belong to the same group or species.
-
Niche: This refers to the role and position a species has in its environment; how it meets its needs for food and shelter, how it survives, and how it reproduces. Each species has its own niche. Deer, mice, owls, and crickets each have different roles in their environment.
-
Trophic Level: This refers to the position an organism occupies in a food chain. Deer and mice are herbivores (primary consumers), owls are carnivores (secondary or tertiary consumers), and crickets are omnivores (can be primary or secondary consumers), so they occupy different trophic levels.
-
Community: This refers to an assemblage of different populations that live together in a defined area. Deer, mice, owls, and crickets could all live in the same geographical area and interact with each other, so they are most likely members of the same community.
Similar Questions
The vertebrate group called ______ includes horses, wolves, cats, humans, cows, mice, deer, pigs, and bats.Multiple choice question.rodentsreptilesmammalsprimates
How many different animal species make up this community
Members of the same species that inhabit the same area are called aMultiple choice question.habitat.community.population.niche.
peakman, J. R., and D. W. Thomas. 2003. Physiological ecology.Pp. 430–480 in Bat ecology (T. H. Kunz and M. B. Fenton, eds.).University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.Steele, M. A., P. D. Smallwood, A. Spunar, and E. Nelsen. 2001.The proximate basis of the oak dispersal syndrome: detection ofseed dormancy by rodents. American Zoologist 41:852–864.Steneck, R. S. 2012. Apex predators and trophic cascades in largemarine ecosystems: learning from serendipity. Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences of the United States of America109:7953–7954.Stier, A. C., et al. 2016. Ecosystem context and historical contin-gency in apex predator recoveries. Science Advances 2:e1501769.Subalusky, A. L., C. L. Dutton, E. J. Rosi-Marshall, andD. M. Post. 2015. The hippopotamus conveyer belt: vectors ofcarbon and nutrients from terrestrial grasslands to aquatic systemsin sub-Saharan Africa. Freshwater Biology 60:512–525.Sussman, R. W., D. Tab Rasmussen, and P. H. Raven. 2013.Rethinking primate origins again. American Journal of Primatology75:95–106.Symondson, W. O., K. D. Sunderland, and M. H. Greenstone.2002. Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents?Annual Review of Entomology 47:561–594.TEEB. 2010. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity, eco-logical and economic foundations (P. Kumar, ed.). Earthscan,London, United Kindgdom and Washington, D.C.Tortato, F. R., T. J. Izzo, R. Hoogesteijn, and C. A. Peres. 2017.The numbers of the beast: valuation of jaguar (Panthera onca)tourism and cattle depredation in the Brazilian Pantanal. GlobalEcology and Conservation 11:106–114.Tschapka, M., and S. Dressler. 2002. Chiropterophily: onbat-flowers and flower-bats. Curtis’s Botanical Magazine19:114–125.Tutin, C. E., R. M. Ham, L. J. White, and M. J. Harrison. 1997.The primate community of the Lopé Reserve, Gabon: diets,responses to fruit scarcity, and effects on biomass. AmericanJournal of Primatology 42:1–24.Vander Wall, S. B. 1994. Seed fate pathways of antelope bitter-brush: dispersal by seed-caching yellow pine chipmunks. Ecology75:1911–1926.Vander Wall, S. B. 1997. Dispersal of singleleaf pinon pine (Pinusmonophylla) by seed-caching rodents. Journal of Mammalogy 78:191.Vander Wall, S. B. 2000. The influence of environmental con-ditions on cache recovery and cache pilferage by yellow pinechipmunks (Tamias amoenus) and deer mice (Peromyscus manicu-latus). Behavioral Ecology 11:544–549.Vander Wall, S. B. 2001. The evolutionary ecology of nut dis-persal. Botanical Review 67:74–117.Vander Wall, S. B. 2002. Masting in animal-dispersed pine facili-tates seed dispersal. Ecology 83:3508–3516.Vander Wall, S. B. 2008. On the relative contributions of wind vs.animals to seed dispersal of four Sierra Nevada pines. Ecology89:1837–1849.Vander Wall, S. B., and S. H. Jenkins. 2003. Reciprocal pilferageand the evolution of food-hoarding behavior. Behavioral Ecology14:656–667.Vander Wall, S. B., and W. S. Longland. 2004. Diplochory: aretwo seed dispersers better than one? Trends in Ecology & Evolution19:155–161.Waldram, M. S., W. J. Bond, and W. D. Stock. 2008. Ecologicalengineering by a mega-grazer: white rhino impacts on a SouthAfrican savanna. Ecosystems 11:101–112.Wanger, T. C., K. Darras, S. Bumrungsri, T. Tscharntke, andA. M. Klein. 2014. Bat pest control contributes to food security inThailand. Biological Conservation 171:220–223.Warren, L. S. 1997. The hunter’s game: poachers and conserva-tionists in twentieth-century America. Yale University Press, NewHaven, Connecticut.Watson, A. J. 2016. Oceans on the edge of anoxia. Science354:1529–1530.Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/100/3/942/5498004 by guest on 21 May 2024
Which aspect of the woodpecker's niche is being decribed as overlapping the niche of the bats in the deciduous forest?
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.