The definition of a "reasonable" suspicion in stop-and-frisk situations was established in:Group of answer choicesCalifornia v. GreenwoodMiranda v. ArizonaTerry v. OhioGates v. Illinois

The Supreme Court case that defined "Stop and Frisk" and permitted temporary detentions based upon reasonable suspicion was

A stop takes place when a law enforcement officer has reasonable suspicion that criminal activity has taken place or is about to take placeGroup of answer choicesTrueFalse

One of the implications of the exclusionary rule is that it:Group of answer choicesit forces officers to gather evidence properlyIt is unlikely for a conviction if the officer follows appropriate proceduresallows the rights of the accused to be overlookedit explains the differences between probable cause and reasonable suspicion

__________ refers to the use of personal judgment by police officers, prosecutors, judges, and other criminal justice system officials regarding whether and how to proceed in a given situation.Group of answer choicesProbable causeReasonable suspicionDiscretionOptional processing

An officer stops someone suspicious and determines they need further observation and may perform