How did professional corporate managers change the nature of manufacturing?Group of answer choicesManagers invested in machine tools and used assembly lines to eliminate old-time craft methodsManagers sought as much as possible to keep the old-time craft methods of manufacturingManagers sought to eliminate completely all small-shop manufacturingManagers preferred to make goods one-at-a-time and rejected a strategy of economies of scale
Question
How did professional corporate managers change the nature of manufacturing?Group of answer choicesManagers invested in machine tools and used assembly lines to eliminate old-time craft methodsManagers sought as much as possible to keep the old-time craft methods of manufacturingManagers sought to eliminate completely all small-shop manufacturingManagers preferred to make goods one-at-a-time and rejected a strategy of economies of scale
Solution
Professional corporate managers significantly changed the nature of manufacturing primarily by investing in machine tools and utilizing assembly lines. This approach effectively eliminated the old-time craft methods that were once prevalent in the industry. Instead of making goods one at a time, managers embraced a strategy of economies of scale, which allowed for the mass production of goods at a lower cost per unit. This shift not only increased efficiency and productivity but also transformed manufacturing into a more standardized and mechanized process. However, it's important to note that while this new approach minimized the use of old-time craft methods, it did not completely eliminate all small-shop manufacturing. Some small-scale manufacturing continued to exist alongside these larger, more mechanized operations.
Similar Questions
Outline the impact the Industrial Revolution had on the development of management approaches.
The The evolution of management is a journey through time that reflects the dynamic nature of business, society, and technology. It showcases how management principles and practices have adapted and transformed in response to various historical, economic, and social forces. This case study explores the fascinating trajectory of management evolution, from its early origins to its contemporary forms, and examines the implications for organizations and managers today. Management as a formal discipline began to take shape during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, coinciding with the onset of industrialization. At this time, businesses were growing in size and complexity, necessitating more structured approaches to organization and administration. The scientific management era, spearheaded by Frederick W. Taylor, emphasized the scientific study of work processes. Taylor introduced time and motion studies to optimize tasks, promoting efficiency and productivity. This period marked a shift from intuitive and rule-of-thumb management to a more systematic approach. The classical management era introduced principles of organization and bureaucracy. Henri Fayol proposed administrative management, emphasizing principles such as division of labor, scalar chain, and unity of command. Max Weber introduced the concept of a bureaucratic organization with clearly defined rules and authority structures. The human relations movement, led by Elton Mayo and others, recognized the significance of human factors in management. It highlighted the impact of social and psychological factors on employee productivity and job satisfaction. The The evolution of management is a journey through time that reflects the dynamicnature of business, society, and technology. It showcases how management principles andpractices have adapted and transformed in response to various historical, economic, andsocial forces. This case study explores the fascinating trajectory of management evolution,from its early origins to its contemporary forms, and examines the implications fororganizations and managers today. Management as a formal discipline began to take shapeduring the late 19th and early 20th centuries, coinciding with the onset of industrialization.At this time, businesses were growing in size and complexity, necessitating more structuredapproaches to organization and administration. The scientific management era,spearheaded by Frederick W. Taylor, emphasized the scientific study of work processes.Taylor introduced time and motion studies to optimize tasks, promoting efficiency andproductivity. This period marked a shift from intuitive and rule-of-thumb management to amore systematic approach. The classical management era introduced principles oforganization and bureaucracy. Henri Fayol proposed administrative management,emphasizing principles such as division of labor, scalar chain, and unity of command. MaxWeber introduced the concept of a bureaucratic organization with clearly
The reasons why different manufacturing methods
What was the first manufacturing process to make significant use of machines on a large scale, both in England and in the U.S.?Multiple choice question.cloth productionweapons manufactureprintingrailroad car production
To make large corporations more efficient, the modern organizational chart did WHICH ONE of the following?Group of answer choicesIt did away with such titles as "manager," "supervisor," and "president"It made the need for daily, monthly, and annual reports unnecessaryIt divided corporations into functional divisionsIt helped a corporation develop its "brand," including its logo and advertising slogan
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.