Question 2Which of the following descriptions of civil law judges are true?Check all that apply1 pointJudges in civil law countries have the primary power to call evidenceCivil law judges have a duty to search for the truthCivil law judges are allowed to write separate or dissenting opinions

Question 2Which of the following descriptions of common law judges is not true?1 pointCommon law judges are allowed to write separate or dissenting opinionsJudges in common law countries have the primary power to call evidence.One of the functions of common law judges is to answer questions about the law

______ law is composed of judges’ legal opinions that reflect community practices and evolve over time.Group of answer choicesCommonMandatoryCivilSovereign

In documents called judicial opinions, judges explainthe reasoning behind their legal rulings, and in thoseexplanations they sometimes cite and discusshistorical and contemporary philosophers. Legalscholar and philosopher Anita L. Allen argues thatwhile judges are naturally inclined to mentionphilosophers whose views align with their ownpositions, the strongest judicial opinions considerand rebut potential objections; discussingphilosophers whose views conflict with judges’ viewscould therefore _______Which choice most logically completes the text?A) allow judges to craft judicial opinions withoutneeding to consult philosophical works.B) help judges improve the arguments they putforward in their judicial opinions.C) make judicial opinions more comprehensible toreaders without legal or philosophical training.D) bring judicial opinions in line with views that arebroadly held among philosophers.

Which of the following statements about judicial institutions is correct?1 point Domestic courts can try international crimes Regional human rights courts can try international crimesAll international courts and tribunals have primacy over domestic jurisdictionsHybrid courts are less effective than tribunals established by the UNSCNone of the above

What useful functions in the legal process can separate and dissentingopinions have?Check all that apply1 pointThey underscore the impartiality of judgesThey can contribute to the development of the lawThey allow judges to avoid common deliberations They serve as a means for judges to express their individual opinions onissues remotely connected to the case