Fill in the Blank QuestionFill in the blank question.Thomas Malthus believed excess population growth leads to social problems, whereas Karl believed that excess population was the result, not the source, of other problems.

Which was Thomas Malthus's argument?View Available Hint(s)for Part AHint 1for Part A.Who was Thomas Malthus, and what did he assert in his work An Essay on the Principle of Population?He argued that if there was no control over population growth, then our civilization would be consumed by famine and war by the end of the 20th century.He argued that if there was no control over population growth, then we would simply create technology to correct the problem.He argued that if there was no control over population growth, then population numbers would increase indefinitely and this would not cause problems.He argued that if there was no control over population growth, then the population would come under check because of war, disease, and starvation.

Why did Thomas Malthus believe that population growth would surpass the available resources?Multiple choice question.There were not enough rich people to help poor families.Fast population growth seemed to surpass the growth of the food supply.There were not enough peasants to grow the necessary crops.There was too much illegal emigration.

Identify Karl Marx's response to Robert Malthus's thesis on world population.Multiple choice question.Overpopulation is linked to the equal distribution of resources.Capitalism devotes resources to the financing of buildings and tools rather than to the necessities of life.There exists a special relationship between world population and the supply of resources.Rising world population, rather than the nature of economic relations, is the cause of social ills.

In 1798 Thomas Malthus argued that populations grew exponentially while food supplies grew arithmetically. Consequently, Malthus argued that food shortages would develop until famine and other checks slowed population growth. What statement correctly explains why Malthus’ prediction did not come true in 1800s Europe?ResponsesUrbanization resulted in smaller household sizes, and the mechanization of agriculture increased food production.Urbanization resulted in smaller household sizes, and the mechanization of agriculture increased food production.Immigration to Europe and the abolition of slavery resulted in a more productive agricultural labor force.Immigration to Europe and the abolition of slavery resulted in a more productive agricultural labor force.Rising education levels among women and increased numbers of single-person households reduced fertility and the demand for food.Rising education levels among women and increased numbers of single-person households reduced fertility and the demand for food.Antinatalist population policies placed limits on the number of children per family and reduced the demand for food.Antinatalist population policies placed limits on the number of children per family and reduced the demand for food.Global trade in manufactured food products increased the food supply and offset the demand for food.

What factor played a major part in keeping Thomas Robert Malthus's prediction from coming true?A.Rates of infectious disease went up around the world.B.The Industrial Revolution increased levels of material production, which had the effect of pushing down birth rates.C.Life expectancy decreased around the world.D.Global inequality became greater.