Mesopotamia’s government was more -Select- than that of Egypt.

The question seems to be incomplete as there is no option provided for the "-Select-" part. However, if we're comparing the governments of ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt, one possible answer could be "decentralized".

Mesopotamia was often more decentralized than Egypt. It was typically made up of city-states, each with their own rulers, while Egypt was usually a unified kingdom under a single pharaoh. This could change depending on the time period, but it's a general trend throughout their histories.

The statement seems to be incomplete. However, based on historical context, one could argue that Mesopotamia's government was more "decentralized" than that of Egypt.

Here's why:

1. Mesopotamia was not a single entity ruled by a single leader, but a region with various city-states, each with its own ruler. These city-states often had their own form of government and laws, making the overall government structure of Mesopotamia quite decentralized.

2. On the other hand, Egypt was usually unified under a single Pharaoh, who was considered a god on earth. The Pharaoh had absolute power, making Egypt's government more centralized.

So, the completed statement would be: "Mesopotamia’s government was more decentralized than that of Egypt."