Why should teachers refrain from making students compete for limited rewards? a. Grading on a curve rewards only the highest achieving students. b. Intrinsic motivation declines in an effort to protect one’s sense of worth. c. Intrinsic motivation increases to meet healthy competitive challenges. d. Limiting rewards encourages students to develop realistic expectations.

Teachers should refrain from making students compete for limited rewards for several reasons:

a. Grading on a curve rewards only the highest achieving students: This method of grading can discourage students who are struggling or who learn at a different pace. It can create an environment where only the top students are recognized, leaving others feeling overlooked or undervalued.

b. Intrinsic motivation declines in an effort to protect one’s sense of worth: When rewards are limited and competition is high, students may begin to question their abilities and self-worth. This can lead to a decrease in intrinsic motivation, as students may feel they are not good enough to earn the rewards.

c. Intrinsic motivation increases to meet healthy competitive challenges: While this can be true in some cases, it is not always the case. Not all students thrive in competitive environments. For some, it can lead to stress, anxiety, and a decrease in motivation.

d. Limiting rewards encourages students to develop realistic expectations: While it's important for students to have realistic expectations, limiting rewards can also discourage students. They may feel that no matter how hard they work, they will not be recognized for their efforts.

In conclusion, while competition can sometimes motivate students, it's important for teachers to ensure that all students feel valued and recognized for their efforts. This can help maintain a healthy learning environment where all students feel motivated to learn.